Hanscomb Returned

 

Waupaca Republican

April 21, 1893

 

WILLIAM HANSCOMB

Brought In from Washington.  Arrested as an Important Witness

 

            It seems that Sheriff Williams’ mission to Washington state was for some purpose. He brought back under arrest as a witness, William Hanscomb who was a lumberman north of Iola at the time and for a few months after the murder of Banker Mead and a short time after Ed Bronson’s failure, he threw up the sponge and skipped out for the West.

            Hanscomb seemed to have lots of money the last winter he was lumbering here, but he lost it gambling etc.  Bronson claimed Hanscomb owed him quite a good deal when he failed in fact there are numbers who claim that Hanscomb got into them for quite a sum.

            A REPUBICAN reporter called on Hanscomb Tuesday.  Deputy Safford pleasantly ushered us into the hall leading to the lower corridor of the jail. The grated iron door was swung back unlocked and we found Mr. Hanscomb really enjoying the freedom of the house and not in the capacity of a criminal.  He was looking well, and after exchanging the usual how-do-you-do’s Hanscomb said:  “You can say to those sensational newspapers that I was never treated better than Mr. Williams has treated me.  I don’t consider that I was arrested like a criminal.  He read the summons or charge and I came right along. I never had a hand in killing Mead.  I was up in the woods north of Iola that night and drove down the following Monday with Abel Dufer.  You can say in your paper that I got quite a sum of money the February following the murder from one of the person now under indictment, and I loaned $300 to D.C. Pavey, Ed Bronson’s attorney of Stevens Point to go East with, I supposed at the time it was in the interest of the clutch that Bemus, Dana and others were endeavoring to push but afterward learned Pavey went east to negotiate some government bonds.  I understand this Pavey is already corralled at Rome, New York and will soon be brought to Waupaca.  I don’t care to come out down town just now but I am expecting money soon from the West and I will probably drop in on Waupaca folks when it comes.”  “You can say this much also; I don’t know whether my testimony amounts to much or not but if what I do know will help weave the coils around any person guilty of butchering H.C. Mead I will be glad.”

            In answer to why he left for the West Hanscomb said:  “I blowed in twelve thousand dollars at gambling.  I drank some but never was a drunkard I thought I knew how to gamble but I found after I lost a fortune I did not.  I was simply a stool pigeon and sucker and I saw I could not get out of the wreck by staying here so went West and have been trying to live as near right as possible and have quit all those abominable habits of gambling etc.”

            Mr. Hanscmb seemed to think that when the trial comes in June there will be some sensational developments.

            To a Sentinel reporter W.S. Bemis, who was Hanscomb’s partner in the lumber business in the winter of 92-3, said when asked if he knew anything about the facts concerning the money Hanscomb paid him.  He said:  “I am not doing any talking, but when the proper times comes I will tell all I know.  In anser to the question if e knew where Hanscomb got the money he paid him Mr. Bemis said:  Hanscomb did not pay me any money. I owed Ed Bronson at that time about $800.  Bronson took out my account and paid me the balance $2,000 which was the amount I sold my share of the lumber business for, and I gave them a bill of sale of my interest.

           

In regard to the arrest, and the taking of Hanscomb to Clintonville and Oshkosh.  The Northwestern of Monday says:

            William Hanscomb formerly of this city, who left here for the west about nine years ago under circumstances which caused some sensation at the time, was in the city Sunday greeting all friends and looking as natural as he did years ago.  But Mr. Hanscomb was in charge of the deputy sheriff of Waupaca county and was looking for bail.  And thereby hangs an interesting tale.  Hanscomb was arrested in the state of Washington about ten days ago by sheriff Williams of Waupaca, on a requisition from Gov. Peck, upon information filed and papers sworn out by the district attorney of that county, charging Hascomb with being accessory after the fact to the murder of Banker Mead in Waupaca in 1882.  Exactly what connection Hanscomb is alleged to have with that murder as to knowledge of it or as accessory after the fact, of course those interested in this now famous case refuse to state at present.  Failing to secure bail in this city Hanscomb was taken back to Waupaca this morning and is now in jail in that city.

            Sheriff Williams of Waupaca arrived in the city this afternoon and was interviewed by a Northwestern reporter while taking a late dinner at the Tremont house.  Mr. Williams was very courteous and willing to give all the information about Hanscomb’s arrest that was proper in view of the coming trial of the great Mead murder case.  He said that a requisition for Hanscomb was placed in his hands by the district attorney of Waupaca county, and that he went to Washington state to find him.  He had a hard job to get him located but finally found him on a ranch four miles from Ruby City, in the county of Okanogan.  It seems that Hanscomb has two large ranches in that vicinity and is quite a heavy stock raiser, Williams says that Hanscomb evinced no surprise at being arrested and took the matter very good naturedly.  He accompanied Williams without an protest, and they had a very pleasant trip across the continent without the necessity of his taking any precautions against Hanscomb’s possible escape.  They reached Waupaca on Friday and as the papers were issued at Clintonville a deputy took Hanscomb over there for examination where he waived examination and was held for trial, the justice fixing his bonds at $2,500.  At Hanscomb’s request the deputy came down here with him Saturday night where he hoped to get bail.  He did not succeed, however, in getting the bail and, as previously remarked, Hanscomb is now in jail in Waupaca.

            Sheriff Williams says that Hanscomb did not talk much about the case during the trip from the Pacific coast, although he did make the remark that some of the parties to the Mead murder would get tuck this time.  He seemed to be well informed of the events that had transpired in Waupaca since he left here nine years ago.  Mr. Williams frankly stated that he was not at liberty to tell what the evidence was against Hanscomb or what part in the drama he is alleged to have played, or what knowledge he was supposed to possess.  He said Hanscomb declared he could prove an alibi, that is, he could prove that he was not in Waupaca on the night of the murder, but Mr. Williams remarked that that did not help his case for he was not arrested as an accessory in the act, but as accessory after the fact.

            “You may not see the connection there is between some thing and Hanscomb’s arrest,” said Sheriff Williams, “but when you come to see the evidence in this case you will see where the links come in and how a good many things will be all changed about from what they now seem to be.  The trial will begin on June 6th, and you can say that the prosecution will be ready for trial and will have some startling testimony to produce.  Then you will see why a certain crowd has made all the opposition possible to the prosecution in this case, and names and facts will come out that will astonish the people, I tell you this is to be one of the most sensational and startling trials that ever took place in this country.  Mr. Williams went on to say that the delays in this case had been the subject of much criticism and ridicule, but the fact was there were so many links to be forged in the chain of evidence and so many points to be covered, and so much caution required in the proceedings that it took a long time to get read and get all the different classes of evidence brought together.  Mr. Williams said he was here today for the purpose of seeing certain arties who were to meet him here to confer in regard to further movements in this case, but of course he was not at liberty to disclose names or further information regarding it.